What is inside
A decision brief, then the evidence
Every figure traces to a verified work in the open scholarly record. Your standing is your published record, unchanged. Publication and funding records show activity, not intent, so every suggestion is labelled as evidence, inference or something only you can confirm.
Decision brief
Three to five relationships to pursue, strengthen or review: the evidence, what GRP infers, what only you can confirm, your own colleagues as a route, and a first step.
Standing
Your published position with its sensitivity range, the pillars, and your five closest peers.
Network
Every verified company group you work with, joint works year by year, and the sectors behind each.
Observed publication activity
Where joint publication is increasing or declining since 2021, as a prompt to investigate, never as a verdict.
Opportunities
Company groups publishing repeatedly with your ten closest peers that are not visible with your institution in the observed record.
Champions and sectors
The colleagues at your university who carry the industry work, and your position in each sector index.
Funded partnerships
UK and EU funded projects with companies, and which of those companies also appear in the co-authorship record.
Evidence and verification
The most-cited joint works, industry-partnered trials, every removed link and why, and the full ledgers as appendices.
A real decision brief, redacted
These pages are a redacted extract of a real Blueprint: the structure, evidence types and wording are as delivered; the university, every company group, every peer university and every person are replaced by labels, and work titles are withheld. They show no rank, score, standing band, sensitivity range, sector position or award status. Read the sample as a page or download it as a PDF.
