Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for University of Milan (Italy), a Gold-band university.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

● Gold standing · Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Europe · 417 universities benchmarked
211,195
co-authored works, 5 years
1,104
partner universities
80
partner countries
931
sustained deep ties
2.98
collaboration impact (FWCI)
96%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Dentistry is the standout field. Ranked #18 in the world for connected research, with Nursing #35, Veterinary #39 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on diversity and sustained. University of Milan sits in the 90th percentile for diversity and the 89th for sustained: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 313 of 327 partners (96%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • International is the softest pillar. At the 70th percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Physical Sciences & Engineering is the at-risk domain. World #442 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (Italy and United States) carry about 64% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win HKU. World top-1. University of Hong Kong is top-146 globally in Health Sciences. Route: Wellcome Trust international partnerships or the Gates Foundation (global health).
  • Win NUS. World top-2. National University of Singapore is top-85 globally in Health Sciences. Route: Wellcome Trust international partnerships or the Gates Foundation (global health).
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. University of Turin returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 3.9). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

934
h-index of the joint research base
18.4M
citations to co-authored work
2.98
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
211,195
co-authored works, 2021-2025
80
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence84th pctReach83rd pctDiversity90th pctSustained89th pctImpact73rd pctInternational70th pctBrokerage98th pct

University of Milan is strongest on diversity (90th percentile), sustained (89th) and influence (84th). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 313 of 327 partners (96%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is International (70th percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveInteEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the Gold band worldwide.
Influence22% weight84th pct+18.5
Impact18% weight73rd pct+13.1
Sustained18% weight89th pct+16.0
Reach16% weight83rd pct+13.3
Diversity16% weight90th pct+14.4
International10% weight70th pct+7.0

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Dentistry18Nursing35Veterinary39Medicine47Pharmacology, Toxicolo…67Immunology & Microbiol…95
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

University of Milan's strongest connected fields are Dentistry #18, Nursing #35, Veterinary #39. The portfolio leans on health & medicine; Physical Sciences & Engineering, at world #442 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #48 for connected research
96/100
Top collaboration partners
🇮🇹 University of Milano-…1,663
🇮🇹 Sapienza University o…1,458
🇮🇹 University of Turin1,374
🇮🇹 University of Padua1,346
🇮🇹 University of Pavia1,297
Life Sciences
World #78 for connected research
94/100
Top collaboration partners
🇮🇹 University of Milano-…579
🇮🇹 University of Padua479
🇮🇹 University of Turin457
🇮🇹 University of Pavia415
🇮🇹 University of Naples …387
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #442 for connected research
63/100
Top collaboration partners
🇺🇸 Columbia University1,029
🇫🇷 Université Paris-Sacl…1,024
🇫🇷 Université Paris Cité969
🇮🇹 University of Bologna936
🇫🇷 Sorbonne Université932
Social Sciences
World #215 for connected research
82/100
Top collaboration partners
🇮🇹 University of Milano-…372
🇺🇸 Columbia University239
🇮🇹 Università Cattolica …226
🇺🇸 George Mason Universi…216
🇮🇹 University of Pavia202
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldUniversity of MilaUniversity of Turi
High yieldStandardLow yield

University of Turin returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 3.9): a consortium waiting to happen. University of Milano-Bicocca, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 2.7: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
🇮🇹 University of Milano-Bicocca2,911 2.7Low yield
🇮🇹 University of Turin2,298 3.9Standard
🇮🇹 University of Padua2,222 3.4Low yield
🇮🇹 Sapienza University of Rome2,145 3.5Low yield
🇮🇹 University of Pavia2,044 3.4Low yield
🇮🇹 University of Naples Federico II1,800 3.5Low yield
🇮🇹 University of Bologna1,751 3.8Standard
🇮🇹 Vita-Salute San Raffaele University1,540 3.8Standard
🇮🇹 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore1,472 3.9Standard
🇮🇹 University of Florence1,446 3.9Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

🇮🇹 Italy 39,652
🇺🇸 United States 12,793
🇬🇧 United Kingdom 8,169
🇫🇷 France 6,489
🇩🇪 Germany 6,193
🇪🇸 Spain 3,349
🇨🇦 Canada 2,490
🇳🇱 Netherlands 2,188

Anchor partner institutions

🇮🇹 University of Milano-Bicocca 2,911
🇮🇹 University of Turin 2,298
🇮🇹 University of Padua 2,222
🇮🇹 Sapienza University of Rome 2,145
🇮🇹 University of Pavia 2,044
🇮🇹 University of Naples Federico II 1,800
🇮🇹 University of Bologna 1,751
🇮🇹 Vita-Salute San Raffaele University 1,540

The network spans 80 countries and 1,104 universities, but the top two carry about 64% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Middle East white-space (0 of the region's 2 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

In Dentistry, the single strongest partnership is 🇮🇹 University of Bari Aldo Moro, with 55 joint works: the natural anchor for a flagship consortium.
Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 5

The research funding behind the network

€156M344 projects
Horizon EuropeHorizon 2020

€156M across 344 funded projects from the European Commission, split €77M Horizon Europe and €80M Horizon 2020, every project traceable to the funder's own record (CORDIS). The fact file adds the ERC and the major national funders, each named and linked, never a single black-box platform.

Funding is shown next to the network because the two move together: the fundable opportunities below are chosen where a real programme already exists to pay for the bridge.

Source: funders' own award systems + CORDIS, awards active 2021–2025 · verified

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

🇭🇰 University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-1

University of Hong Kong is top-146 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Dentistry.

Funding route: Wellcome Trust international partnerships or the Gates Foundation (global health)

🇸🇬 National University of Singapore Singapore · world top-2

National University of Singapore is top-85 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Dentistry.

Funding route: Wellcome Trust international partnerships or the Gates Foundation (global health)

🇭🇰 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-3

Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-132 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Dentistry.

Funding route: Wellcome Trust international partnerships or the Gates Foundation (global health)

🇦🇺 Monash University Australia · world top-7

Monash University is top-43 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Dentistry.

Funding route: Wellcome Trust international partnerships or the Gates Foundation (global health)

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Luigi Sacco HospitalCentre for Multidisciplinary Research in Health ScienceMilano University Press
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyAgricultural and Biological SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and FinancePhysics and Astronomy

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

🇩🇰 University of Southern DenmarkDenmark
🇩🇪 University of GöttingenGermany
🇫🇷 Université Paris Sciences et LettresFrance
🇺🇸 University of UtahUnited States
🇨🇳 Sun Yat-sen UniversityChina

Signature joint research

The most-cited work produced with partners, each verifiable.

Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesLegal Cases and Commentary

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt HKU and a Middle East hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the University of Turin tie into a consortium concept in Health & Medicine.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the international gap and the physical sciences & engineering weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Subject Award spotlight

Celebrating your significant contributions

We have identified the partnerships below as candidates for the Subject Awards, for a significant contribution to connected research. Each is anchored to a real, cited joint paper, with the lead author taken from that paper's own authorship record.

Dentistry · candidate
with 🇨🇭 University of Bern
★ Maria Grazia Cagetti

Non-communicable Diseases and Oral Health: An Overview

2021 · 127 citations

Their most-cited joint work, on dental health and care utilization, has been cited 127 times and anchors a 55-paper partnership in dentistry.

See the Dentistry candidates →
These are candidates, not winners. The full slate is undergoing complete review by our editorial team ahead of the awards, and the Subject Awards are exclusive to partner universities.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for University of Milan.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.