Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for Taipei Medical University (TW), ranked in the global index.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

◇ Ranked in the Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Asia-Pacific · 391 universities benchmarked
15,221
co-authored works, 5 years
773
partner universities
68
partner countries
339
sustained deep ties
2.21
collaboration impact (FWCI)
91%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Strong on international and influence. Taipei Medical University sits in the 54th percentile for international and the 35th for influence: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 65 of 71 partners (91%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • Sustained is the softest pillar. At the 17th percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Physical Sciences & Engineering is the at-risk domain. World #1,101 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (TW and United States) carry about 77% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win University of Cambridge. World top-6. University of Cambridge is top-110 globally in Health Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Win Monash University. World top-7. Monash University is top-43 globally in Health Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. Harvard University returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 5.8). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

320
h-index of the joint research base
2.3M
citations to co-authored work
2.21
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
15,221
co-authored works, 2021-2025
42
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence35th pctReach23rd pctDiversity25th pctSustained17th pctImpact34th pctInternational54th pctBrokerage60th pct

Taipei Medical University is strongest on international (54th percentile), influence (35th) and impact (34th). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 65 of 71 partners (91%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is Sustained (17th percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveInteEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the global ranked cohort.
Influence22% weight35th pct+7.7
Impact18% weight34th pct+6.1
Sustained18% weight17th pct+3.1
Reach16% weight23rd pct+3.7
Diversity16% weight25th pct+4.0
International10% weight54th pct+5.4

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #277 for connected research
77/100
Top collaboration partners
National Taiwan Unive…1,098
National Yang Ming Ch…1,032
China Medical Univers…745
Chang Gung University574
Kaohsiung Medical Uni…400
Life Sciences
World #481 for connected research
60/100
Top collaboration partners
National Taiwan Unive…464
National Yang Ming Ch…413
China Medical Univers…328
Kaohsiung Medical Uni…216
Chang Gung University201
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #1101 for connected research
8/100
Top collaboration partners
National Taiwan Unive…291
National Yang Ming Ch…127
National Taiwan Unive…124
China Medical Univers…112
Chang Gung University76
Social Sciences
World #1039 for connected research
13/100
Top collaboration partners
National Taiwan Unive…118
National Yang Ming Ch…65
National Cheng Kung U…54
China Medical Univers…34
Chang Gung University31
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldNational Taiwan UnNational Yang MingNational Sun Yat-sHarvard University
High yieldStandardLow yield

Harvard University returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 5.8): a consortium waiting to happen. National Sun Yat-sen University, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 1.7: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
National Taiwan University1,926 2.0Standard
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University1,724 1.7Standard
China Medical University1,123 2.5Standard
Chang Gung University868 2.1Standard
Kaohsiung Medical University740 1.9Standard
National Cheng Kung University600 1.9Standard
National Chung Hsing University337 1.9Standard
National Sun Yat-sen University278 1.7Low yield
National Tsing Hua University270 2.4Standard
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology254 2.9Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

TW 8,301
🇺🇸 United States 1,964
🇬🇧 United Kingdom 643
ID 623
🇦🇺 Australia 502
🇨🇳 China 496
🇯🇵 Japan 371
🇭🇰 Hong Kong SAR 346

Anchor partner institutions

National Taiwan University 1,926
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University 1,724
China Medical University 1,123
Chang Gung University 868
Kaohsiung Medical University 740
National Cheng Kung University 600
National Chung Hsing University 337
National Sun Yat-sen University 278

The network spans 68 countries and 773 universities, but the top two carry about 77% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Europe white-space (9 of the region's 100 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

🇬🇧 University of Cambridge United Kingdom · world top-6

University of Cambridge is top-110 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

🇦🇺 Monash University Australia · world top-7

Monash University is top-43 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

🇬🇧 University of Edinburgh United Kingdom · world top-9

University of Edinburgh is top-147 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

🇸🇬 Nanyang Technological University Singapore · world top-14

Nanyang Technological University is top-538 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Taipei Medical University HospitalWan Fang HospitalTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyEngineeringMedicineEnvironmental Science

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

🇩🇪 University of SiegenGermany
🇺🇸 Colorado School of MinesUnited States
🇨🇳 Kunming University of Science and TechnologyChina
Mohammed V UniversityMA
Moscow State UniversityTJ
Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismMicroRNA in disease regulationEpigenetics and DNA MethylationBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentAir Quality and Health Impacts

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt University of Cambridge and a Europe hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the Harvard University tie into a consortium concept in Health & Medicine.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the sustained gap and the physical sciences & engineering weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for Taipei Medical University.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named rivals.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, 22 July 2026 to be included at the 1 September launch.

Claim your fact file →

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your rivals.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two rivals with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 172,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

172,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 1 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.