Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for Southwest Jiaotong University (China), ranked in the global index.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

β—‡ Ranked in the Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Asia-Pacific · 391 universities benchmarked
36,217
co-authored works, 5 years
842
partner universities
64
partner countries
521
sustained deep ties
2.62
collaboration impact (FWCI)
89%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Strong on influence and impact. Southwest Jiaotong University sits in the 73rd percentile for influence and the 55th for impact: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 109 of 123 partners (89%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • Diversity is the softest pillar. At the 16th percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Health & Medicine is the at-risk domain. World #860 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (China and United States) carry about 81% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win University of Oxford. World top-4. University of Oxford is top-84 globally in Physical Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Win UCL. World top-5. University College London is top-93 globally in Physical Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. Hong Kong Polytechnic University returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 4.8). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

373
h-index of the joint research base
3.8M
citations to co-authored work
2.62
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
36,217
co-authored works, 2021-2025
31
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence73rd pctReach33rd pctDiversity16th pctSustained44th pctImpact55th pctInternational18th pctBrokerage34th pct

Southwest Jiaotong University is strongest on influence (73rd percentile), impact (55th) and sustained (44th). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 109 of 123 partners (89%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is Diversity (16th percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the global ranked cohort.
Influence22% weight73rd pct+16.1
Impact18% weight55th pct+9.9
Sustained18% weight44th pct+7.9
Reach16% weight33rd pct+5.3
Diversity16% weight16th pct+2.6
International10% weight18th pct+1.8

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #860 for connected research
28/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University280
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing Medical Uni…128
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ University of Electro…74
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chinese Academy of Me…73
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Central South Univers…60
Life Sciences
World #858 for connected research
28/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University211
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing Medical Uni…90
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Central South Univers…78
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Shanghai Jiao Tong Un…69
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Peking University68
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #49 for connected research
96/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University1,026
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ University of Electro…775
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing University518
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu University of…484
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu University435
Social Sciences
World #590 for connected research
51/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University88
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong Polytechnic…45
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu University of…44
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HKU38
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ University of Electro…36
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldSichuan UniversityUniversity of ElecHong Kong PolytechNorthwestern Polyt
High yieldStandardLow yield

Hong Kong Polytechnic University returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 4.8): a consortium waiting to happen. Northwestern Polytechnical University, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 2.4: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University1,417 3.3Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ University of Electronic Science and Technology of China891 3.0Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing University495 3.9Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu University of Technology485 3.6Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu University472 3.0Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Tsinghua University434 4.6Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Shanghai Jiao Tong University423 4.6Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Tongji University415 3.8Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Xi'an Jiaotong University339 3.8Standard
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong Polytechnic University338 4.8High yield
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China 16,837
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 1,339
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ United Kingdom 1,241
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong SAR 947
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Australia 654
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada 636
πŸ‡«πŸ‡· France 415
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ Singapore 311

Anchor partner institutions

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University 1,417
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 891
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing University 495
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu University of Technology 485
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu University 472
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Tsinghua University 434
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Shanghai Jiao Tong University 423
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Tongji University 415

The network spans 64 countries and 842 universities, but the top two carry about 81% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Europe white-space (7 of the region's 100 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ University of Oxford United Kingdom · world top-4

University of Oxford is top-84 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ University College London United Kingdom · world top-5

University College London is top-93 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ University of Cambridge United Kingdom · world top-6

University of Cambridge is top-97 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Harvard University United States · world top-8

Harvard University is top-62 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: NSF / NIH international collaboration supplements, or a Human Frontier Science Program grant

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

State Key Laboratory of Traction PowerSouthwest Jiaotong University Hope College
EngineeringSocial Sciences

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

Comenius University BratislavaSK
πŸ‡«πŸ‡· UniversitΓ© de PoitiersFrance
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Thomas Jefferson UniversityUnited States
Sechenov UniversityRU
National Research University Higher School of EconomicsRU
Railway Engineering and DynamicsRailway Systems and Energy EfficiencyCivil and Geotechnical Engineering ResearchGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresTransportation Planning and OptimizationMechanical stress and fatigue analysis

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt University of Oxford and a Europe hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the Hong Kong Polytechnic University tie into a consortium concept in Physical Sciences & Engineering.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the diversity gap and the health & medicine weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for Southwest Jiaotong University.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named rivals.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, 22 July 2026 to be included at the 1 September launch.

Claim your fact file →

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your rivals.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two rivals with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 172,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

172,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 1 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.