Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for Queensland University of Technology (Australia), a Gold-band university.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

โ— Gold standing · Research Collaboration Index
๐ŸŒ Asia-Pacific · 391 universities benchmarked
28,918
co-authored works, 5 years
1,126
partner universities
78
partner countries
863
sustained deep ties
3.54
collaboration impact (FWCI)
92%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Energy is the standout field. Ranked #55 in the world for connected research, with Business, Management & Accounting #61, Materials Science #73 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on impact and reach. Queensland University of Technology sits in the 92nd percentile for impact and the 88th for reach: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 113 of 122 partners (92%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • Diversity is the softest pillar. At the 71st percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Life Sciences is the at-risk domain. World #665 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (Australia and United States) carry about 70% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win NTU Singapore. World top-14. Nanyang Technological University is top-280 globally in Social Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Win University of Zurich. World top-23. University of Zurich is top-153 globally in Social Sciences. Route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. Deakin University returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 4.2). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

607
h-index of the joint research base
5.6M
citations to co-authored work
3.54
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
28,918
co-authored works, 2021-2025
80
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence79th pctReach88th pctDiversity71st pctSustained84th pctImpact92nd pctInternational81st pctBrokerage69th pct

Queensland University of Technology is strongest on impact (92nd percentile), reach (88th) and sustained (84th). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 113 of 122 partners (92%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is Diversity (71st percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveInteEach block is a pillarโ€™s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the Gold band worldwide.
Influence22% weight79th pct+17.4
Impact18% weight92nd pct+16.6
Sustained18% weight84th pct+15.1
Reach16% weight88th pct+14.1
Diversity16% weight71st pct+11.4
International10% weight81st pct+8.1

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Energy55Business, Management &โ€ฆ61Materials Science73Chemical Engineering73Engineering109Health Professions118
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

Queensland University of Technology's strongest connected fields are Energy #55, Business, Management & Accounting #61, Materials Science #73. The portfolio leans on social sciences; Life Sciences, at world #665 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #414 for connected research
65/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Queโ€ฆ2,806
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Griffith University757
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Monash University687
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Melโ€ฆ582
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Sydโ€ฆ549
Life Sciences
World #665 for connected research
44/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Queโ€ฆ1,730
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Monash University1,000
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ University of Tasmania903
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Western Sydney Univerโ€ฆ895
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Melโ€ฆ215
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #501 for connected research
58/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Queโ€ฆ1,954
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Monash University548
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Griffith University402
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ UNSW Sydney381
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ University of Tasmania342
Social Sciences
World #350 for connected research
71/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Queโ€ฆ911
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Griffith University293
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Melโ€ฆ258
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Monash University235
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Sydโ€ฆ203
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldThe University of Monash UniversityGriffith UniversitDeakin University
High yieldStandardLow yield

Deakin University returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 4.2): a consortium waiting to happen. Griffith University, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 3.1: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Queensland6,791 3.2Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Monash University2,197 3.8Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Griffith University1,506 3.1Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ University of Tasmania1,396 3.9Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Western Sydney University1,334 3.7Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Melbourne1,170 3.6Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Sydney1,109 3.9Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ UNSW Sydney1,057 3.7Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ University of Technology Sydney667 3.6Standard
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Western Australia528 4.1Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 22,974
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 4,895
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 4,594
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 3,094
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 1,285
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 1,227
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 939
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New Zealand 635

Anchor partner institutions

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Queensland 6,791
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Monash University 2,197
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Griffith University 1,506
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ University of Tasmania 1,396
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Western Sydney University 1,334
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Melbourne 1,170
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ The University of Sydney 1,109
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ UNSW Sydney 1,057

The network spans 78 countries and 1,126 universities, but the top two carry about 70% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Middle East white-space (0 of the region's 2 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nanyang Technological University Singapore · world top-14

Nanyang Technological University is top-280 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Business, Management & Accounting.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ University of Zurich Switzerland · world top-23

University of Zurich is top-153 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Business, Management & Accounting.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Queen Mary University of London United Kingdom · world top-25

Queen Mary University of London is top-352 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Business, Management & Accounting.

Funding route: the Human Frontier Science Program or a Belmont Forum collaborative-research action

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง University of Birmingham United Kingdom · world top-31

University of Birmingham is top-139 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Business, Management & Accounting.

Funding route: the Human Frontier Science Program or a Belmont Forum collaborative-research action

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Translational Research InstituteMetro South HealthARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital ChildARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture
EngineeringEnvironmental ScienceBusiness, Management and AccountingMedicine

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น University of BolognaItaly
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Universitรฉ Claude Bernard Lyon 1France
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ ร‰cole Polytechnique Fรฉdรฉrale de LausanneSwitzerland
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ University of Southern DenmarkDenmark
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช University of GรถttingenGermany
Traffic and Road SafetyAir Quality and Health ImpactsBusiness Process Modeling and AnalysisOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesUrban Transport and AccessibilityClimate Change and Health Impacts

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt NTU Singapore and a Middle East hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the Deakin University tie into a consortium concept in Social Sciences.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the diversity gap and the life sciences weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for Queensland University of Technology.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.