Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for ETH Zurich (Switzerland), a Platinum-band university.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

◆ Platinum standing · Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Europe · 417 universities benchmarked
74,414
co-authored works, 5 years
1,135
partner universities
79
partner countries
979
sustained deep ties
3.61
collaboration impact (FWCI)
95%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Agricultural & Biological Sciences is the standout field. Ranked #2 in the world for connected research, with Environmental Science #4, Earth & Planetary Sciences #5 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on international and impact. ETH Zurich sits in the 98th percentile for international and the 94th for impact: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 362 of 383 partners (95%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • Diversity is the softest pillar. At the 80th percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Health & Medicine is the at-risk domain. World #546 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (United States and Switzerland) carry about 44% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win HKU. World top-1. University of Hong Kong is top-127 globally in Physical Sciences. Route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes.
  • Win CUHK. World top-3. Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-150 globally in Physical Sciences. Route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. University of Oxford returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 8.4). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

1,162
h-index of the joint research base
26.7M
citations to co-authored work
3.61
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
74,414
co-authored works, 2021-2025
91
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence91st pctReach90th pctDiversity80th pctSustained91st pctImpact94th pctInternational98th pctBrokerage91st pct

ETH Zurich is strongest on international (98th percentile), impact (94th) and influence (91st). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 362 of 383 partners (95%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is Diversity (80th percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveInteEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the Platinum band worldwide.
Influence22% weight91st pct+20.0
Impact18% weight94th pct+16.9
Sustained18% weight91st pct+16.4
Reach16% weight90th pct+14.4
Diversity16% weight80th pct+12.8
International10% weight98th pct+9.8

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Agricultural & Biologi…2Environmental Sci.4Earth & Planetary Scie…5Mathematics9Engineering19Computer Sci.20
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

ETH Zurich's strongest connected fields are Agricultural & Biological Sciences #2, Environmental Science #4, Earth & Planetary Sciences #5. The portfolio leans on physical sciences & engineering; Health & Medicine, at world #546 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #546 for connected research
54/100
Top collaboration partners
🇨🇭 University of Zurich2,067
🇨🇭 University of Basel445
🇨🇭 University of Bern381
🇨🇭 École Polytechnique F…235
🇺🇸 Harvard University188
Life Sciences
World #179 for connected research
85/100
Top collaboration partners
🇨🇭 University of Zurich2,201
🇦🇹 University of Vienna628
🇨🇿 Charles University610
🇩🇪 Christian-Albrechts-U…591
🇧🇪 University of Mons575
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #65 for connected research
95/100
Top collaboration partners
🇨🇭 University of Zurich3,408
🇨🇭 École Polytechnique F…1,781
🇫🇷 Université Paris-Sacl…1,331
🇨🇭 University of Bern1,206
🇺🇸 Caltech1,035
Social Sciences
World #475 for connected research
60/100
Top collaboration partners
🇨🇭 University of Zurich696
🇨🇭 University of Bern161
🇨🇭 École Polytechnique F…140
🇩🇪 Ludwig-Maximilians-Un…139
🇨🇭 University of Basel136
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldUniversity of ZuriÉcole PolytechniquUniversity of MonsUniversity of Oxfo
High yieldStandardLow yield

University of Oxford returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 8.4): a consortium waiting to happen. University of Zurich, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 3.9: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
🇨🇭 University of Zurich6,183 3.9Low yield
🇨🇭 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne1,857 4.0Low yield
🇨🇭 University of Bern1,528 5.2Standard
🇦🇹 University of Vienna1,239 2.4Low yield
🇨🇭 University of Basel1,220 3.9Low yield
🇨🇿 Charles University985 0.7Low yield
🇧🇪 University of Mons958 0.2Low yield
🇧🇪 Université Libre de Bruxelles924 1.1Low yield
🇩🇪 Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel916 0.7Low yield
University of Tartu873 0.9Low yield
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

🇺🇸 United States 17,161
🇨🇭 Switzerland 12,555
🇩🇪 Germany 10,363
🇬🇧 United Kingdom 7,860
🇫🇷 France 7,741
🇨🇳 China 5,243
🇮🇹 Italy 3,504
🇧🇪 Belgium 3,355

Anchor partner institutions

🇨🇭 University of Zurich 6,183
🇨🇭 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne 1,857
🇨🇭 University of Bern 1,528
🇦🇹 University of Vienna 1,239
🇨🇭 University of Basel 1,220
🇨🇿 Charles University 985
🇧🇪 University of Mons 958
🇧🇪 Université Libre de Bruxelles 924

The network spans 79 countries and 1,135 universities, but the top two carry about 44% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Middle East white-space (0 of the region's 2 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

In Environmental Science, the single strongest partnership is 🇨🇭 University of Zurich, with 387 joint works: the natural anchor for a flagship consortium.
Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

🇭🇰 University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-1

University of Hong Kong is top-127 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Environmental Science.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

🇭🇰 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-3

Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-150 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Environmental Science.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

🇦🇺 Monash University Australia · world top-7

Monash University is top-215 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Environmental Science.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

🇬🇧 King's College London United Kingdom · world top-10

King's College London is top-581 globally in Physical Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Environmental Science.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Institute for Biomedical EngineeringSwiss Data Science CenterCollegium HelveticumETH Zürich FoundationCSCS - Swiss National Supercomputing CentreNCCR SwissMAPMAGIC TelescopesNCCR Catalysis
Earth and Planetary SciencesEnvironmental SciencePhysics and Astronomy

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

🇬🇧 University of ExeterUnited Kingdom
🇺🇸 University of MichiganUnited States
🇫🇮 University of HelsinkiFinland
🇸🇪 Lund UniversitySweden
🇬🇧 University of NottinghamUnited Kingdom

Signature joint research

The most-cited work produced with partners, each verifiable.

Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchGeological and Geochemical Analysisearthquake and tectonic studiesClimate variability and modelsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesHigh-pressure geophysics and materials

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt HKU and a Middle East hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the University of Oxford tie into a consortium concept in Physical Sciences & Engineering.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the diversity gap and the health & medicine weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Subject Award spotlight

Celebrating your significant contributions

We have identified the partnerships below as candidates for the Subject Awards, for a significant contribution to connected research. Each is anchored to a real, cited joint paper, with the lead author taken from that paper's own authorship record.

Computer Science · candidate
with 🇨🇭 University of Zurich
★ Fernando Navarro

The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

2022 · 1,175 citations

Their most-cited joint work, on advanced neural network applications, has been cited 1,175 times and anchors a 218-paper partnership in computer science.

See the Computer Science candidates →
Environmental Science · candidate
with 🇨🇭 University of Zurich
★ Benjamin D. Stocker

Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries

2023 · 863 citations

Their most-cited joint work, on coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, has been cited 863 times and anchors a 375-paper partnership in environmental science.

See the Environmental Science candidates →
Engineering · candidate
with 🇨🇭 University of Zurich
★ Metin Sitti

Soft actuators for real-world applications

2021 · 832 citations

Their most-cited joint work, on advanced sensor and energy harvesting materials, has been cited 832 times and anchors a 876-paper partnership in engineering.

See the Engineering candidates →
These are candidates, not winners. The full slate is undergoing complete review by our editorial team ahead of the awards, and the Subject Awards are exclusive to partner universities.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for ETH Zurich.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.