Subject Award · Social Sciences · 2026
Ten finalist universities for the Economics, Econometrics & Finance Subject Award, listed here alphabetically until the full index publishes on 15 September. Each finalist is represented by an academic whose recent work shows what world-class collaboration looks like: a real project, drawn from the open scholarly record, cited so you can check it.
The finalists
From Imitation to Innovation: Where Is All That Chinese R&D Going?
Built around an endogenous growth model in which firms upgrade technology by innovating or imitating, the study quantifies how misallocation shapes productivity growth in emerging economies. Estimated on the empirical distribution of research spending and productivity growth in China from 2007 to 2012, and compared with Taiwan, it uses counterfactuals to weigh alternative policies.
Brouwer is a leading health economist at Erasmus University Rotterdam working on economic evaluation, welfare theory and societal decision-making in healthcare. In this seven-country European study with partners including Bocconi University, Universidade Nova de Lisboa and Universitat Hamburg, he examined public familiarity with, adherence to and trust in WHO preventive measures during the pandemic.
Sassi, formerly head of the OECD public health programme, studies the economics of chronic disease prevention and fiscal policies for health at Imperial College Business School. In this eleven-country European collaboration he helped benchmark government food-environment policies using the Food-EPI index, identifying priority actions for healthier food systems across diverse economies.
Robinson is an environmental economist directing the Grantham Research Institute at LSE, working on the economics of climate change, food security and livelihoods. She co-authored the 2023 Lancet Countdown report, a global multi-institution assessment tracking health and climate indicators, which argues for a health-centred economic response to accelerating climate harms.
Singapore's health-care system: key features, challenges, and shifts
Every country grapples with how to organise and pay for health care, and each system offers lessons for the others. The work examines Singapore's health-care system, setting out its key features, the challenges it confronts and the shifts taking place within it.
Energy demand reduction options for meeting national zero-emission targets in the United Kingdom
Cutting how much energy we use may matter as much as changing how we produce it. Building a bottom-up, whole-system framework applied to the United Kingdom, the study finds that energy demand could fall by 52 per cent by 2050 without compromising citizens' quality of life, reducing reliance on high-risk carbon dioxide removal technologies.
Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2
Every tonne of carbon dioxide imposes costs on society, and governments need a credible number for them. Updating the social cost of carbon with improved socioeconomic projections, climate models, damage functions and discounting methods, the study shows that comprehensive evidence implies a higher value than the estimates governments have relied on for over a decade.
Work that can be done from home: evidence on variation within and across occupations and industries
Which jobs can actually be done from home? Rather than treating occupations as uniform, the study examines evidence on how the scope for home working varies both within and across occupations and industries, offering a more finely grained picture of a question with clear consequences for how work is organised.
Decoupling of SDGs followed by re-coupling as sustainable development progresses
Progress on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals does not happen in isolation, as advances on one goal can move with or against others. The study examines relationships among the goals over time, describing a pattern in which they first decouple and later re-couple as sustainable development progresses, insight relevant to coordinating policy across goals.
“This research provides internationally agreed guidance for transparent and consistent reporting of health economic evaluations so that evidence on costs and outcomes can be trusted, compared and used.”
Health economic evaluations guide decisions about which interventions to fund, so they must be reported clearly. The work presents the CHEERS 2022 statement, updated reporting guidance that replaces the 2013 version, designed to apply more easily to all types of health economic evaluation and to reflect new methods and the increased role of stakeholders.
Exclusive to partners
Partners verify their data, feature their academics, and are eligible for the Subject Awards. Finalists are identified from open data; winners are decided by our editorial team and announced on 15 September 2026.
Explore partnership →The wider slate
Air Pollution and Manufacturing Firm Productivity: Nationwide Estimates for China
Portfolio constructions in cryptocurrency market: A CVaR-based deep reinforcement learning approach
Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk
The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic
QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Financial uncertainty and real activity: The good, the bad, and the ugly
Maddisonβstyle estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2023 update
Energy demand reduction options for meeting national zero-emission targets in the United Kingdom
← All subject awards · The full Economics, Econometrics & Finance index →