Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for University of Ottawa (Canada), a Gold-band university.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

โ— Gold standing · Research Collaboration Index
๐ŸŒ North America · 251 universities benchmarked
46,171
co-authored works, 5 years
1,129
partner universities
80
partner countries
941
sustained deep ties
3.06
collaboration impact (FWCI)
92%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Decision Sciences is the standout field. Ranked #6 in the world for connected research, with Nursing #27, Health Professions #50 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on diversity and sustained. University of Ottawa sits in the 90th percentile for diversity and the 89th for sustained: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 135 of 147 partners (92%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • International is the softest pillar. At the 73rd percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Physical Sciences & Engineering is the at-risk domain. World #434 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (Canada and United States) carry about 72% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win HKU. World top-1. University of Hong Kong is top-146 globally in Health Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Win CUHK. World top-3. Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-132 globally in Health Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. McMaster University returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 7.0). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

857
h-index of the joint research base
12.1M
citations to co-authored work
3.06
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
46,171
co-authored works, 2021-2025
80
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence88th pctReach89th pctDiversity90th pctSustained89th pctImpact76th pctInternational73rd pctBrokerage85th pct

University of Ottawa is strongest on diversity (90th percentile), sustained (89th) and reach (89th). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 135 of 147 partners (92%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is International (73rd percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveInteEach block is a pillarโ€™s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the Gold band worldwide.
Influence22% weight88th pct+19.4
Impact18% weight76th pct+13.7
Sustained18% weight89th pct+16.0
Reach16% weight89th pct+14.2
Diversity16% weight90th pct+14.4
International10% weight73rd pct+7.3

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Decision Sciences6Nursing27Health Professions50Mathematics66Economics, Econometricโ€ฆ72Psychology73
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

University of Ottawa's strongest connected fields are Decision Sciences #6, Nursing #27, Health Professions #50. The portfolio leans on health & medicine; Physical Sciences & Engineering, at world #434 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #108 for connected research
91/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto3,913
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McMaster University2,199
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Britishโ€ฆ1,894
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Calgary1,742
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McGill University1,452
Life Sciences
World #313 for connected research
74/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto683
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McGill University408
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Britishโ€ฆ298
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McMaster University277
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Calgary267
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #434 for connected research
64/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Carleton University548
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto294
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McGill University198
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Britishโ€ฆ168
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Waterloo166
Social Sciences
World #162 for connected research
86/100
Top collaboration partners
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto830
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McMaster University418
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Britishโ€ฆ389
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McGill University384
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Queen's University347
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldUniversity of ToroMcMaster UniversitMcGill UniversityQueen's University
High yieldStandardLow yield

McMaster University returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 7.0): a consortium waiting to happen. McGill University, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 3.1: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto5,722 5.0Standard
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McMaster University3,044 7.0High yield
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of British Columbia2,631 3.7Standard
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Calgary2,342 3.7Standard
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McGill University2,316 3.1Low yield
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Alberta2,032 4.7Standard
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Western University1,955 4.7Standard
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Queen's University1,951 7.1High yield
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Universitรฉ de Montrรฉal1,716 3.1Standard
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Dalhousie University1,559 3.2Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 33,812
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 13,979
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom 5,618
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 3,742
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France 2,815
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 2,696
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany 2,125
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 1,737

Anchor partner institutions

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto 5,722
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McMaster University 3,044
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of British Columbia 2,631
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Calgary 2,342
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ McGill University 2,316
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Alberta 2,032
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Western University 1,955
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Queen's University 1,951

The network spans 80 countries and 1,129 universities, but the top two carry about 72% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Middle East white-space (0 of the region's 2 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

In Decision Sciences, the single strongest partnership is ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto, with 116 joint works: the natural anchor for a flagship consortium.
Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 5

The research funding behind the network

โ‚ฌ0M20 projects
Horizon EuropeHorizon 2020

€0M across 20 funded projects from the European Commission, split €0M Horizon Europe and €0M Horizon 2020, every project traceable to the funder's own record (CORDIS). The fact file adds the ERC and the major national funders, each named and linked, never a single black-box platform.

Funding is shown next to the network because the two move together: the fundable opportunities below are chosen where a real programme already exists to pay for the bridge.

Source: funders' own award systems + CORDIS, awards active 2021–2025 · verified

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-1

University of Hong Kong is top-146 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Decision Sciences.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-3

Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-132 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Decision Sciences.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nanyang Technological University Singapore · world top-14

Nanyang Technological University is top-538 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Decision Sciences.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ University of Zurich Switzerland · world top-23

University of Zurich is top-114 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in Decision Sciences.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOttawa HospitalRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreMontfort HospitalMax Planck - University of Ottawa Centre for Extreme and Quantum PhotonicsInstitut du Savoir MontfortUniversity of Ottawa Skills and Simulation CentreJoint Attosecond Science Laboratory
Social SciencesHealth ProfessionsDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of AlbertaCanada
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Leiden UniversityNetherlands
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Michigan State UniversityUnited States
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Wageningen University & ResearchNetherlands
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ California Institute of TechnologyUnited States

Signature joint research

The most-cited work produced with partners, each verifiable.

Canadian Identity and HistoryHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePhotonic and Optical DevicesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt HKU and a Middle East hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the McMaster University tie into a consortium concept in Health & Medicine.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the international gap and the physical sciences & engineering weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Subject Award spotlight

Celebrating your significant contributions

We have identified the partnerships below as candidates for the Subject Awards, for a significant contribution to connected research. Each is anchored to a real, cited joint paper, with the lead author taken from that paper's own authorship record.

Decision Sciences · candidate
with ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ University of Toronto
★ Larissa Shamseer

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

2021 · 97,390 citations

Their most-cited joint work, on meta-analysis and systematic reviews, has been cited 97,390 times and anchors a 116-paper partnership in decision sciences.

See the Decision Sciences candidates →
These are candidates, not winners. The full slate is undergoing complete review by our editorial team ahead of the awards, and the Subject Awards are exclusive to partner universities.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for University of Ottawa.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.