Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for University of Brawijaya (ID), ranked in the global index.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

◇ Ranked in the Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Asia-Pacific · 391 universities benchmarked
30,121
co-authored works, 5 years
601
partner universities
66
partner countries
212
sustained deep ties
0.93
collaboration impact (FWCI)
89%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Business, Management & Accounting is the standout field. Ranked #526 in the world for connected research, with Dentistry #618, Nursing #623 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on diversity and reach. University of Brawijaya sits in the 20th percentile for diversity and the 6th for reach: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 64 of 72 partners (89%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • International is the softest pillar. At the 2nd percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Physical Sciences & Engineering is the at-risk domain. World #387 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (ID and MY) carry about 79% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win HKU. World top-1. University of Hong Kong is top-94 globally in Social Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Win CUHK. World top-3. Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-130 globally in Social Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. Hasanuddin University returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 2.1). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

150
h-index of the joint research base
0.5M
citations to co-authored work
0.93
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
30,121
co-authored works, 2021-2025
15
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence4th pctReach6th pctDiversity20th pctSustained5th pctImpact3rd pctInternational2nd pctBrokerage57th pct

University of Brawijaya is strongest on diversity (20th percentile), reach (6th) and sustained (5th). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 64 of 72 partners (89%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is International (2nd percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the global ranked cohort.
Influence22% weight4th pct+0.9
Impact18% weight3rd pct+0.5
Sustained18% weight5th pct+0.9
Reach16% weight6th pct+1.0
Diversity16% weight20th pct+3.2
International10% weight2nd pct+0.2

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Business, Management &…526Dentistry618Nursing623Pharmacology, Toxicolo…645Chemical Engineering750Psychology776
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

University of Brawijaya's strongest connected fields are Business, Management & Accounting #526, Dentistry #618, Nursing #623. The portfolio leans on social sciences; Physical Sciences & Engineering, at world #387 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #359 for connected research
70/100
Top collaboration partners
Airlangga University381
University of Indones…204
Universitas Gadjah Ma…141
Hasanuddin University105
Udayana University83
Life Sciences
World #85 for connected research
93/100
Top collaboration partners
Airlangga University236
State University of M…122
IPB University111
Universitas Gadjah Ma…104
Hasanuddin University78
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #387 for connected research
68/100
Top collaboration partners
State University of M…300
Sepuluh Nopember Inst…118
Universitas Gadjah Ma…105
Airlangga University105
Diponegoro University67
Social Sciences
World #23 for connected research
98/100
Top collaboration partners
State University of M…239
Airlangga University127
University of Indones…85
Universitas Gadjah Ma…83
Universitas Negeri Su…46
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldAirlangga UniversiState University oHasanuddin UniversUniversitas Jember
High yieldStandardLow yield

Hasanuddin University returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 2.1): a consortium waiting to happen. Universitas Gadjah Mada, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 1.2: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
Airlangga University808 1.5Standard
State University of Malang721 1.4Standard
Universitas Gadjah Mada406 1.2Low yield
University of Indonesia353 1.4Standard
Hasanuddin University238 2.1Standard
Diponegoro University215 1.5Standard
Sebelas Maret University212 1.4Standard
IPB University207 1.5Standard
Universitas Jember189 1.0Low yield
Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology185 1.6Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

ID 5,329
MY 602
🇯🇵 Japan 389
🇬🇧 United Kingdom 335
🇦🇺 Australia 297
🇺🇸 United States 228
TW 174
🇳🇱 Netherlands 128

Anchor partner institutions

Airlangga University 808
State University of Malang 721
Universitas Gadjah Mada 406
University of Indonesia 353
Hasanuddin University 238
Diponegoro University 215
Sebelas Maret University 212
IPB University 207

The network spans 66 countries and 601 universities, but the top two carry about 79% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Europe white-space (5 of the region's 100 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

🇭🇰 University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-1

University of Hong Kong is top-94 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

🇭🇰 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-3

Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-130 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

🇬🇧 University College London United Kingdom · world top-5

University College London is top-13 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: the Human Frontier Science Program or a Belmont Forum collaborative-research action

🇬🇧 University of Cambridge United Kingdom · world top-6

University of Cambridge is top-35 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: the Human Frontier Science Program or a Belmont Forum collaborative-research action

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Social SciencesAgricultural and Biological SciencesMedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

🇵🇱 Maria Curie-Skłodowska UniversityPoland
Hasanuddin UniversityID
🇯🇵 Tokushima UniversityJapan
🇧🇷 Universidade Estadual de MaringáBrazil
🇯🇵 Shizuoka UniversityJapan
SMEs Development and Digital MarketingFood and Agricultural SciencesLegal Studies and PoliciesPublic Health and NutritionIslamic Finance and CommunicationEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt HKU and a Europe hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the Hasanuddin University tie into a consortium concept in Social Sciences.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the international gap and the physical sciences & engineering weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for University of Brawijaya.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.