Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for Universidad de Málaga (Spain), ranked in the global index.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

◇ Ranked in the Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Europe · 417 universities benchmarked
19,976
co-authored works, 5 years
897
partner universities
75
partner countries
519
sustained deep ties
2.12
collaboration impact (FWCI)
86%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology & Pharmaceutics is the standout field. Ranked #70 in the world for connected research, with Arts & Humanities #269, Agricultural & Biological Sciences #454 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on diversity and sustained. Universidad de Málaga sits in the 51st percentile for diversity and the 44th for sustained: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 58 of 68 partners (86%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • Influence is the softest pillar. At the 29th percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Physical Sciences & Engineering is the at-risk domain. World #680 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (Spain and United States) carry about 69% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win HKU. World top-1. University of Hong Kong is top-94 globally in Social Sciences. Route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes.
  • Win NUS. World top-2. National University of Singapore is top-115 globally in Social Sciences. Route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. Universitat Rovira i Virgili returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 3.9). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

340
h-index of the joint research base
2.4M
citations to co-authored work
2.12
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
19,976
co-authored works, 2021-2025
36
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence29th pctReach43rd pctDiversity51st pctSustained44th pctImpact31st pctInternational38th pctBrokerage14th pct

Universidad de Málaga is strongest on diversity (51st percentile), sustained (44th) and reach (43rd). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 58 of 68 partners (86%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is Influence (29th percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveInteEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the global ranked cohort.
Influence22% weight29th pct+6.4
Impact18% weight31st pct+5.6
Sustained18% weight44th pct+7.9
Reach16% weight43rd pct+6.9
Diversity16% weight51st pct+8.2
International10% weight38th pct+3.8

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Pharmacology, Toxicolo…70Arts & Humanities269Agricultural & Biologi…454Chemistry475Mathematics498Nursing519
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

Universidad de Málaga's strongest connected fields are Pharmacology, Toxicology & Pharmaceutics #70, Arts & Humanities #269, Agricultural & Biological Sciences #454. The portfolio leans on social sciences; Physical Sciences & Engineering, at world #680 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #596 for connected research
50/100
Top collaboration partners
🇪🇸 Universidad de Granada287
🇪🇸 Universidad de Sevilla252
🇪🇸 Universitat de Barcel…224
🇪🇸 Universitat de Valènc…200
🇪🇸 University of Córdoba158
Life Sciences
World #662 for connected research
45/100
Top collaboration partners
🇪🇸 Universidad de Granada113
🇪🇸 Universidad de Sevilla90
🇪🇸 Universitat de Barcel…71
🇪🇸 Universidad Autónoma …61
🇪🇸 Universitat de Valènc…60
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #680 for connected research
43/100
Top collaboration partners
🇪🇸 Universidad de Granada261
🇪🇸 Universidad de Sevilla183
🇪🇸 University of Córdoba117
🇪🇸 Universidad Compluten…108
🇪🇸 Universitat de Valènc…75
Social Sciences
World #189 for connected research
84/100
Top collaboration partners
🇪🇸 Universidad de Granada281
🇪🇸 Universidad de Sevilla174
🇪🇸 Universidad Compluten…108
🇪🇸 Universidad de Cádiz86
🇪🇸 Universitat de Valènc…68
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldUniversidad de GraUniversidad de SevUniversidad de CádUniversitat Rovira
High yieldStandardLow yield

Universitat Rovira i Virgili returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 3.9): a consortium waiting to happen. Universidad de Cádiz, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 1.3: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
🇪🇸 Universidad de Granada841 2.8Standard
🇪🇸 Universidad de Sevilla612 2.6Standard
🇪🇸 Universidad de Cádiz426 1.3Low yield
🇪🇸 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid423 1.7Low yield
🇪🇸 Universidad Complutense de Madrid370 2.4Low yield
🇪🇸 Universitat de Barcelona366 3.0Standard
🇪🇸 Universitat de València363 2.2Low yield
🇪🇸 University of Córdoba331 3.0Standard
🇪🇸 University of the Basque Country250 2.9Standard
🇪🇸 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona208 2.7Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

🇪🇸 Spain 6,796
🇺🇸 United States 1,289
🇬🇧 United Kingdom 870
🇫🇷 France 828
🇮🇹 Italy 662
🇩🇪 Germany 550
🇧🇷 Brazil 365
🇳🇱 Netherlands 295

Anchor partner institutions

🇪🇸 Universidad de Granada 841
🇪🇸 Universidad de Sevilla 612
🇪🇸 Universidad de Cádiz 426
🇪🇸 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 423
🇪🇸 Universidad Complutense de Madrid 370
🇪🇸 Universitat de Barcelona 366
🇪🇸 Universitat de València 363
🇪🇸 University of Córdoba 331

The network spans 75 countries and 897 universities, but the top two carry about 69% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the North America white-space (2 of the region's 62 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

🇭🇰 University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-1

University of Hong Kong is top-94 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

🇸🇬 National University of Singapore Singapore · world top-2

National University of Singapore is top-115 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

🇭🇰 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-3

Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-130 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

🇬🇧 University of Oxford United Kingdom · world top-4

University of Oxford is top-11 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: Horizon Europe (associated-country participation) or bilateral Royal Society / DFG / ANR schemes

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea "La Mayora"Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la VictoriaRed Española de SupercomputaciónConsorcio de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Andalucía (CBUA)
Social SciencesComputer Science

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

Assiut UniversityEG
🇪🇸 University of AlicanteSpain
Iran University of Medical SciencesIR
🇺🇸 Philadelphia UniversityUnited States
🇺🇸 University of Wisconsin–MilwaukeeUnited States
Communication and COVID-19 ImpactMedia and Digital CommunicationSocial Sciences and PoliciesAdvertising and Communication StudiesE-Learning and Knowledge ManagementEducational Innovations and Technology

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt HKU and a North America hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the Universitat Rovira i Virgili tie into a consortium concept in Social Sciences.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the influence gap and the physical sciences & engineering weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for Universidad de Málaga.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.