Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for State University of Malang (ID), ranked in the global index.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

◇ Ranked in the Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Asia-Pacific · 391 universities benchmarked
32,396
co-authored works, 5 years
380
partner universities
52
partner countries
123
sustained deep ties
0.99
collaboration impact (FWCI)
89%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Social Sciences is the standout field. Ranked #681 in the world for connected research, with Arts & Humanities #685, Chemical Engineering #739 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on impact and diversity. State University of Malang sits in the 4th percentile for impact and the 3rd for diversity: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 51 of 57 partners (89%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • International is the softest pillar. At the 2nd percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Life Sciences is the at-risk domain. World #593 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (ID and MY) carry about 89% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win HKU. World top-1. University of Hong Kong is top-94 globally in Social Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Win CUHK. World top-3. Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-130 globally in Social Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. Sebelas Maret University returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 2.3). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

134
h-index of the joint research base
0.4M
citations to co-authored work
0.99
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
32,396
co-authored works, 2021-2025
12
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence2nd pctReach2nd pctDiversity3rd pctSustained2nd pctImpact4th pctInternational2nd pctBrokerage61st pct

State University of Malang is strongest on impact (4th percentile), diversity (3rd) and influence (2nd). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 51 of 57 partners (89%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is International (2nd percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveInteEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the global ranked cohort.
Influence22% weight2nd pct+0.4
Impact18% weight4th pct+0.7
Sustained18% weight2nd pct+0.4
Reach16% weight2nd pct+0.3
Diversity16% weight3rd pct+0.5
International10% weight2nd pct+0.2

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Social Sciences681Arts & Humanities685Chemical Engineering739Business, Management &…777Pharmacology, Toxicolo…810Energy832
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

State University of Malang's strongest connected fields are Social Sciences #681, Arts & Humanities #685, Chemical Engineering #739. The portfolio leans on social sciences; Life Sciences, at world #593 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #579 for connected research
52/100
Top collaboration partners
Airlangga University79
University of Brawija…76
Universitas Negeri Su…51
Universiti Teknologi …46
State University of S…41
Life Sciences
World #593 for connected research
50/100
Top collaboration partners
University of Brawija…122
University of Technol…31
Airlangga University26
Universitas Negeri Su…22
Universiti Teknologi …21
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #202 for connected research
83/100
Top collaboration partners
University of Brawija…300
University of Technol…217
University of Malaya150
Sebelas Maret Univers…139
Bandung Institute of …119
Social Sciences
World #9 for connected research
99/100
Top collaboration partners
University of Brawija…239
Universitas Negeri Su…203
Yogyakarta State Univ…169
State University of S…146
Institut Agama Islam …145
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldUniversity of BrawUniversitas NegeriAirlangga UniversiInstitut Agama Isl
High yieldStandardLow yield

Sebelas Maret University returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 2.3): a consortium waiting to happen. Airlangga University, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 1.1: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
University of Brawijaya721 1.4Standard
Universitas Negeri Surabaya378 1.2Standard
University of Technology Malaysia371 1.4Standard
State University of Semarang278 1.3Standard
Sebelas Maret University264 2.3High yield
Yogyakarta State University257 2.2Standard
State University of Padang246 2.0Standard
Universiti Teknologi MARA242 1.6Standard
Airlangga University233 1.1Standard
University of Malaya229 1.5Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

ID 4,389
MY 1,220
🇯🇵 Japan 197
🇦🇺 Australia 144
🇨🇳 China 105
🇬🇧 United Kingdom 96
TW 87
🇹🇭 Thailand 85

Anchor partner institutions

University of Brawijaya 721
Universitas Negeri Surabaya 378
University of Technology Malaysia 371
State University of Semarang 278
Sebelas Maret University 264
Yogyakarta State University 257
State University of Padang 246
Universiti Teknologi MARA 242

The network spans 52 countries and 380 universities, but the top two carry about 89% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Europe white-space (1 of the region's 100 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

🇭🇰 University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-1

University of Hong Kong is top-94 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

🇭🇰 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR · world top-3

Chinese University of Hong Kong is top-130 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

🇬🇧 University of Oxford United Kingdom · world top-4

University of Oxford is top-11 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: the Human Frontier Science Program or a Belmont Forum collaborative-research action

🇬🇧 University College London United Kingdom · world top-5

University College London is top-13 globally in Social Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: the Human Frontier Science Program or a Belmont Forum collaborative-research action

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Computer ScienceSocial Sciences

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

Yogyakarta State UniversityID
State University of SemarangID
🇮🇳 University of RajasthanIndia
Sepuluh Nopember Institute of TechnologyID
Andalas UniversityID
Educational Methods and Media UseEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsEducation and Character DevelopmentSTEM EducationEducational Methods and OutcomesSMEs Development and Digital Marketing

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt HKU and a Europe hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the Sebelas Maret University tie into a consortium concept in Social Sciences.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the international gap and the life sciences weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for State University of Malang.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.