Global Research PartnershipsCreate free account
Research Collaboration Index
A worked example using real, public data for Chongqing Medical University (China), ranked in the global index.  See a world-leading example (Oxford) →

The enhanced fact file

Your entire collaboration network, read like a strategist would.

Not a scorecard. A dossier that tells a university leader exactly where the strengths, the risks and the fundable opportunities are, every figure sourced from the open research record.

β—‡ Ranked in the Research Collaboration Index
🌍 Asia-Pacific · 391 universities benchmarked
38,824
co-authored works, 5 years
811
partner universities
65
partner countries
478
sustained deep ties
2.15
collaboration impact (FWCI)
87%
of partners non-redundant

The one-screen strategic read

Where you stand, at a glance.

The first thing a leader needs is not more data, it is a verdict. Three strengths to lead with, three challenges to manage, three opportunities to act on, each drawn straight from the network below.

Strengths
  • Dentistry is the standout field. Ranked #132 in the world for connected research, with Nursing #151, Immunology & Microbiology #232 close behind: the anchors to build consortia around.
  • Strong on influence and sustained. Chongqing Medical University sits in the 81st percentile for influence and the 38th for sustained: genuine, defensible strengths.
  • A genuine bridge, not just a hub. 122 of 140 partners (87%) are non-redundant, so it connects communities that would not otherwise meet.
Challenges
  • International is the softest pillar. At the 8th percentile it sits clearly below the others: the single clearest place to build.
  • Social Sciences is the at-risk domain. World #1,047 for connected research, far behind the rest of the portfolio: a real gap, not a crown jewel.
  • Network concentration. The top two partner countries (China and United States) carry about 95% of collaboration volume: depth, but a thin long tail.
Opportunities
  • Win University of Oxford. World top-4. University of Oxford is top-29 globally in Health Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Win UCL. World top-5. University College London is top-8 globally in Health Sciences. Route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program.
  • Convert your highest-yield tie. Chongqing University returns the highest impact of your partners (FWCI 2.5). Formalise it into a funded consortium to compound impact, not just volume.

Scholarly weight

The impact behind the network

Collaboration only counts if the work lands. This is the citation weight of everything produced with partners, the substance under the network.

393
h-index of the joint research base
4.5M
citations to co-authored work
2.15
field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
38,824
co-authored works, 2021-2025
24
collaboration efficiency, impact per tie

Visualisation 1

Your collaboration profile

Seven pillars, each shown as a global percentile. The dashed ring marks the top-decile benchmark; anything inside it is a genuine, defensible strength.

Influence81st pctReach27th pctDiversity18th pctSustained38th pctImpact32nd pctInternational8th pctBrokerage52nd pct

Chongqing Medical University is strongest on influence (81st percentile), sustained (38th) and impact (32nd). Its brokerage diagnostic shows 122 of 140 partners (87%) are non-redundant, a genuine bridge between communities rather than a wide publisher.

The pillar to watch is International (8th percentile), the softest of the six and the clearest place to build.

Source: the open global research record, co-authored works 2021–2025, fractional counting

The anatomy of your standing

Exactly what your position is built from

Six pillars, each weighted, combine into one standing index. Nothing is hidden: this is the entire calculation, in a single bar.

InflImpaSustReacDiveEach block is a pillar’s weighted contribution; together they place the university in the global ranked cohort.
Influence22% weight81st pct+17.8
Impact18% weight32nd pct+5.8
Sustained18% weight38th pct+6.8
Reach16% weight27th pct+4.3
Diversity16% weight18th pct+2.9
International10% weight8th pct+0.8

Brokerage is reported alongside as a diagnostic, not folded into the score, so a university cannot inflate its standing simply by publishing widely. It measures whether you connect communities that would otherwise stay apart.

Visualisation 2

Where you lead the world, by field

Each subject placed on a log scale of world rank (1 to 1,195). The further left, the more globally central. Gold marks a top-50 standout, blue a solid position.

#1#10#100#1000Dentistry132Nursing151Immunology & Microbiol…232Pharmacology, Toxicolo…234Health Professions381Arts & Humanities392
Standout (top 50)Solid (top 150)Ranked

Chongqing Medical University's strongest connected fields are Dentistry #132, Nursing #151, Immunology & Microbiology #232. The portfolio leans on health & medicine; Social Sciences, at world #1,047 in the deep-dive below, is the clear at-risk area, exactly the gap this chart surfaces.

Source: subject-level indices, 26 fields, minimum 50-university gate

Discipline deep-dive

How you collaborate, faculty by faculty

The same network split into its four broad domains, each with its world rank for connected research and the five partners it leans on most. This is the view a dean or pro-vice-chancellor acts on.

Health & Medicine
World #64 for connected research
95/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Dalian Medical Univer…4,276
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Army Medical Universi…2,142
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University1,563
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing University1,466
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sun Yat-sen University1,202
Life Sciences
World #92 for connected research
92/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Dalian Medical Univer…2,205
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Army Medical Universi…1,383
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University1,383
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Peking University1,200
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chinese Academy of Me…1,145
Physical Sciences & Engineering
World #989 for connected research
17/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Dalian Medical Univer…595
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing University382
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Army Medical Universi…309
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University251
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Shanghai Jiao Tong Un…210
Social Sciences
World #1047 for connected research
12/100
Top collaboration partners
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Dalian Medical Univer…108
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Army Medical Universi…95
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Peking University59
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University59
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sun Yat-sen University57
Source: domain-level co-authorship, partner institutions 2021–2025

Visualisation 3

Which partnerships actually pay off

Every anchor partner plotted by collaboration volume against the citation impact of the joint work. The prize quadrant is top-right: high volume and high impact. The bottom-right is the trap: a lot of output, little impact.

Joint works (collaboration volume) →Impact (FWCI) →high yieldDalian Medical UniArmy Medical UniveChongqing UniversiFudan University
High yieldStandardLow yield

Chongqing University returns the highest impact of the set (FWCI 2.5): a consortium waiting to happen. Fudan University, by contrast, is a sizeable partner returning FWCI 1.7: worth asking what that volume is buying.

PartnerJoint worksFWCIYield
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Dalian Medical University6,401 2.3Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Army Medical University3,453 2.3Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing University2,449 2.5Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University2,161 2.5Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Peking University1,921 1.8Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sun Yat-sen University1,632 2.1Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College1,573 1.9Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Huazhong University of Science and Technology1,501 1.8Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Central South University1,469 2.2Standard
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Shanghai Jiao Tong University1,454 2.0Standard
Source: institution-to-institution co-authorship ledger + field-weighted citation impact

Visualisation 4

Your global reach, and where it thins out

Top partner countries

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China 58,839
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 4,382
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ United Kingdom 937
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong SAR 855
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Australia 652
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada 539
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Germany 390
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Sweden 215

Anchor partner institutions

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Dalian Medical University 6,401
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Army Medical University 3,453
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chongqing University 2,449
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sichuan University 2,161
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Peking University 1,921
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Sun Yat-sen University 1,632
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College 1,573
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Huazhong University of Science and Technology 1,501

The network spans 65 countries and 811 universities, but the top two carry about 95% of the volume. That concentration is where the resilience question lives, and the Europe white-space (0 of the region's 100 leading collaborators) is the clearest gap to close.

Source: co-authorship by partner-institution country, 2021–2025

Visualisation 6

The partners to win next

Not a generic wish-list. Globally central universities you are not yet deeply partnered with, each with the reason it matters and the specific programme that would fund the collaboration.

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ University of Oxford United Kingdom · world top-4

University of Oxford is top-29 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ University College London United Kingdom · world top-5

University College London is top-8 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ University of Cambridge United Kingdom · world top-6

University of Cambridge is top-110 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Monash University Australia · world top-7

Monash University is top-43 globally in Health Sciences. You have no joint publications yet, and it is a natural, fundable bridge in your strongest field.

Funding route: an NSFC / JSPS / A*STAR bilateral programme, or the Human Frontier Science Program

Source: network white-space analysis + funder-programme mapping

The research base

The ecosystem behind the collaboration

A partnership does not plug into a name, it plugs into a base: the affiliated hospitals, presses, institutes and archives, and the research themes where the joint work concentrates.

Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityStomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityPeople's Hospital of Bishan DistrictThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyMedicine

Context

Your competitive set, and your signature research

Benchmarked against

The named peer group your fact file compares you to, pillar by pillar and subject by subject.

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chengdu UniversityChina
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ Tokyo Metropolitan UniversityJapan
Middle East Technical UniversityTR
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ Kanazawa UniversityJapan
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ John Brown UniversityUnited States
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFerroptosis and cancer prognosisMicroRNA in disease regulationRNA modifications and cancerLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

From insight to action

A 90-day plan, written from the data.

The dossier ends where a strategy meeting begins: three moves, sequenced, each pointing back to a specific finding above.

0-30 days
Name the target

Adopt University of Oxford and a Europe hub as formal partnership targets; brief the relevant deans with the joint white-space evidence.

30-60 days
Open the funding route

Scope the specific programme for each target, and turn the Chongqing University tie into a consortium concept in Health & Medicine.

60-90 days
Interrogate the soft spots

Address the international gap and the social sciences weakness; set a diversification target for the long tail; and secure an editorial feature in the reputation-survey window.

Your fact file

Claim the full fact file for Chongqing Medical University.

Everything above is the open view. The full partner fact file goes further: every ranked subject and subfield, the complete partner ledger with yield, your named academics and their signature work, the funder-by-funder route map for each target, and this same dossier on up to ten named peers.

Partner fact file · locked

Unlocked for partners. Confirm before 12:00, Tuesday 25 August 2026 to be included at the 15 September launch.

See the full enhanced fact file → Claim & verify yours

Free to claim and verify your data. No obligation. Your ranking is unaffected by partnership, and always will be.

Exclusive to partners

Plus this same dossier on up to 10 of your peers.

Every partnership includes the full intelligence on your named competitive set, their strengths, their funders, their white-space, so you can see exactly where you lead and where to close the gap. Two peers with Recognition, five with Partnership, up to ten with Flagship.

Your research, in front of 170,000 academics, with full reporting.

Partnership also places your research as editorial features in the Research Network Report, our newsletter to a verified global academic audience, timed to the reputation-survey season. Every send comes with a full performance report: opens, clicks and geography, benchmarked against the edition.

The Research Network Report

170,000
verified academic subscribers worldwide
Nov–Jan
timed to the reputation-survey season
Full report
opens, clicks and geography on every feature

See your own dossier, built for your university.

Submit your data and we will build and review your enhanced fact file with you, then show exactly how a partnership turns it into advantage, before the index goes public on 15 September 2026.

Request a partnership conversation →
Global Research Partnerships · globalresearchpartnerships.com/rci · Built on the open global research record and the award data of the world's major funders. Methodology.