Research Collaboration Index

The Collaboration and Funding Blueprint

Reputation says who you are.Collaboration says who you work with.The Blueprint says who you should work with next.

You cannot see your own network from inside it. The Blueprint reads all 1,195 ranked universities on your behalf and tells you who to partner with next, why, and who would pay for it.

Who it is for

For the people who decide where the partnership budget goes.

Research leadership and partnership offices at ranked universities have to decide where to send limited time, travel and matched funding. The Blueprint is a decision document for that choice: it names the universities to partner with next, the field that justifies each one, and the route that would fund it.

Every university knows its rankings. Almost none knows its network.

Most universities can name their partners. Very few can say which ones pay.

Your partnership strategy is a record of who visited. This is a map of who matters.

The partners you should win next are already in the open record. From inside one institution, they are invisible.

Written so the first page is the only page a vice-chancellor has to read, and the other thirteen are where the research office goes to work.

Three promises

What the Blueprint gives you, and the proof under each.

A position you can defend.

Every point in your standing, broken down, measured against the five universities the index places closest to you, not a peer set chosen to flatter.

Proof: six scored pillars as global percentiles, brokerage reported beside the score and never inside it, and all 26 of your published field positions, each read against those five peers.

Partners you can name.

Specific institutions, the field that justifies each one, and exactly where they are ahead of you.

Proof: named universities, not categories. See the example sentence below.

A route that pays.

The fund, scheme or bilateral programme that would finance each recommended partnership.

Proof: CORDIS evidence for the 417 ranked universities the European Commission publishes, NIH award records for the 158 with US federal funding, mapped to the country pair.

"Nanyang Technological University rank first in Computer Science against your third, and they are not among your fifteen anchor partners."

A sentence of the kind the Blueprint writes, checked against the published 2026 index. That sentence is the product.

Why you can trust it

It cannot move your position. That is the point.

Your free results page shows you the shape. The Blueprint gives you the names. Find your university in the rankings →

Questions you will ask

The three we hear most.

"We already have SciVal."

SciVal tells you what you published. The Blueprint tells you who to call. They are not the same purchase, and the second one has a named shortlist at the end of it.

"Is this the paid version of the ranking?"

No, and it cannot be. The ranking is free, the method is published in advance, and nothing in a partnership touches a score. That is a structural fact, not a promise.

"We have partnership agreements covering this."

So does everyone. The question the Blueprint answers is which of them carry citation impact and which are volume without return, and that is a page in the document, not a claim in a brochure.

Enquire

Start with one question: who should we work with next?

Tell us the university and the decision in front of you. We will come back with a sample page from a Blueprint, the options, and the time it takes to deliver.

Three options, one document. Every option is the same Blueprint for your university. They differ only in how many peers you want read in the same depth: five, ten or twenty. Compare the options →

Enquire about your Blueprint

Tell us who you are and which university it is for. We reply within one working day with a sample page and a scoping call if you want one. No obligation, no card.

We use your details only to reply to this enquiry. The index stays free, public and unchanged whatever you decide.