Founding offer · lifetime membership for a single £24, exclusive to our first members · closes 20 June Claim your place →
Global Research Partnerships £24 Lifetime Log inCreate free account

Funded Projects › FP7

POLPART · How citizens try to influence politics and why. International comparisons of movement and party politics

FP7Status: CLOSED1 January 201431 December 2018EU funding €2,230,800

Protests in ‘new’ democracies about ‘stolen elections’, demonstrations in ‘old’ democracies against austerity measures, occupied squares all over the world against inequality and for better governance. Some argue that contentious politics gains importance and party politics declines. Is that so and why would that be? Why is it that some individuals engage in politics while others remain apathetic? Why is it that some citizens take the electoral route, while others engage in contentious politics? The truth is that we do not really know. Should we bother? I think we should. Citizens who are actively involved in politics are an asset to democracy. Understanding how and why people take part in politics would help to build more democratic societies.The proposed project compares participation in contentious and non-contentious politics in various countries within a single theoretical and methodological framework. A central tenet of this research proposal is that sooner or later every citizen might get involved in politics. I seek the reason why in the interplay of dynamics at the individual, the organizational, and the societal level. What are the motives people have? What are the appeals parties and movement organizations disseminate; and what are the opportunities and constraints regimes impose?Comparison is the core of the project. It encompasses four subproject: (1) a meta-analysis of publications on movement and party politics; (2) comparisons of political participation over time and countries in global survey data; (3) focus group discussions to understand the formation of political engagement and disengagement in four ‘old’ democracies (the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, U.S.A.), two post-communist ‘new’ democracies (Hungary, Romania) and two post-authoritarian ‘new’ democracies (Brazil, Argentina) and Greece as a country that was hit harder than any country by the financial crisis; (4) experimental focused surveys among 1000 respondents to quantify patterns of political participation in the same nine countries.

Consortium · 5 organisations

coordinator

STICHTING VU

NL · €1,722,000

participant

THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

UK · €221,700

participant

UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE GENERAL SAN MARTIN

AR · €68,100

participant

KOZEP-EUROPAI EGYETEM

HU · €219,000

participant

FUNDACAO UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASILIA

BR

Research fields

View the official record on CORDIS →

← Find collaborators and more funded projects

Source: CORDIS, Publications Office of the European Union. Global Research Partnerships surfaces open EU research data to help you find collaborators; we are not affiliated with the European Union.