Founding offer · lifetime membership for a single £24, exclusive to our first members · closes 20 June Claim your place →
Global Research Partnerships £24 Lifetime Log inCreate free account

Funded Projects › FP7

LEGAL CULTURES · Differences in European Legal Cultures: A Study on Dispute Agreements As a Form of Private Regulation

FP7Status: CLOSED1 March 201029 February 2012EU funding €171,485

The proposal focuses on dispute agreement as to evidence, qualification and interpretation. Those are increasingly relied upon by the parties, in consumer and business contracts in domestic and cross-boarder transactions. They provide for a private regulation and are meant to impose the solutions parties agreed upon in case of disputes as to the contract. The legal effect attach to these agreements differs among the major European jurisdictions. I will demonstrate that these differences reflect deeper, underlying differences in legal culture in the major European jurisdictions. The research will include 3 steps. First, a comparative and analytical enquiry as to the legal effects of dispute agreements (UK, France and Germany and EU Principles). The purpose of this phase is to show for each jurisdiction to what extent the parties are allowed to depart from the usual rules on dispute and, therefore, the depth and limits of the freedom granted to the parties to modify the power of the judge. Second, a synthetic analysis of the extent to which the limits to the enforceability of private regulation can provide evidence as to accepted deviation from the normal public judicial role. The interest of this analysis is to show the relationship between restrictions on freedom of contract and core cultural fundamental procedural principles (judicial impartiality, principle of fair trial, etc.). Third, an assessment of prospective changes on these issues in connection with the procedural principals directly or indirectly stated in international norms such as the European Convention of Human Rights. This step reaches out directly to European Private Law as such and contributes to its construction.. A guide on the comparative effect of dispute agreements is, per se, a useful tool for transactions’ security in Europe. The deeper analysis of the cultural reasons that account for differences is needed to anticipate further European legal harmonization.

Consortium · 1 organisation

coordinator

THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD

UK · €171,485

Research fields

View the official record on CORDIS →

← Find collaborators and more funded projects

Source: CORDIS, Publications Office of the European Union. Global Research Partnerships surfaces open EU research data to help you find collaborators; we are not affiliated with the European Union.